<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Travelay.com &#187; Air France</title>
	<atom:link href="http://travelay.com/tag/air-france/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://travelay.com</link>
	<description>The travel blog with big ideas</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Jun 2010 18:49:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Fat Fares for Air France passengers</title>
		<link>http://travelay.com/fat-fares-for-air-france-passengers/23/</link>
		<comments>http://travelay.com/fat-fares-for-air-france-passengers/23/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 19:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Airlines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air France]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fat passengers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://travelay.com/?p=23</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Considering flying with Air France this year? You&#8217;ll be interested to learn that the airline has decided to introduce additional requirements for those too large to fit into one seat &#8211; they&#8217;ll have to buy two tickets. Well, almost : the tax and surcharges will be waived for the second seat as, quite rightly, only [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Considering flying with Air France this year? You&#8217;ll be interested to learn that the airline has decided to introduce additional requirements for those too large to fit into one seat &#8211; they&#8217;ll have to buy two tickets. Well, almost : the tax and surcharges will be waived for the second seat as, quite rightly, only one passenger is flying.</p>
<p>As someone rather slim myself, I&#8217;m quite pleased to see this imitative. Airlines constantly badger their passengers for taking over the 20kg luggage allowance, without taking into consideration the weight of the passengers themselves. Even if I took three heavy bags, I&#8217;d still probably weigh less than the kind of passenger who requires two seats.</p>
<p>Just so you know I&#8217;m not a total bigot, I don&#8217;t judge my fellow passengers for their size or weight. Rather I believe that if you&#8217;re in a position where you are inconveniencing other passengers or worse, putting yourself in danger then having two seats is essential. And if that means paying for it, so be it.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not clear how this is going to work yet. I would like to see a clause whereby if the plane isn&#8217;t full then the second seat is refunded.That way the passenger gets two seats and the airline isn&#8217;t missing out on revenue because the seat would have been empty anyway.</p>
<p>Anyway, feel free to comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://travelay.com/fat-fares-for-air-france-passengers/23/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

